Donald J. Trump Had Your Back! Executive Order 13849 (what Has Biden Done For You!)

                                 DONALD J. TRUMP HAD YOUR BACK                                           EXECUTIVE ORDER 13849                                                                                (What Has Biden Done For You!)

                                   Sources extrapolated from: state.gov

            For all the ignorant people, out there I’m stating it loud and clear that Donald J. Trump was fighting for you on many levels. He implemented an Executive Order 13849, on September 20, 2018. As a declaration of national emergencies was declared he implemented this order. On March 6, 2014, had to take additional steps in order reinforce the new Executive Order. It was order 13694 on April 1, 2015, was expanded to another Executive Order 13757 on December 28, 2016. “The International Emergency Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (Public Law 115-44) (CAATSA), the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-272), (UFSA), section 212(paragraph F) of the immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182 (section F), and section 301, title 3 of the United States.”

The prohibitions are as follows.  

           Financial institutions within the United States are prohibited from allowing credit or making loans to a sanctioned person for more than $10,000,000 within a 12-month span. Unless it’s for a good cause, i.e., activities to relieve human suffering.

           The ability to prohibit foreign exchange transactions within the jurisdiction of the United States where the sanctioned person has any interest. To stop, and not allow payments between financial. Institutions, or transfers of credit subject to the scrutiny to United States. The blocking of interests in property of a sanctioned number of people in the United States or come within the control of any person in the United States. That such property may not be exported, withdrawn, or transferred.       Any person in the United States wouldn’t be allowed to purchase great amounts of equity or debt instruments of the sanctioned person. To disturb the executive officer, officers or persons performing similar functions deemed by the Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of State, and the President himself.

            People that would be blocked would be those that are involved in contribution of services, goods, or funds. Goods, services, from a sanctioned person that would be received. What is explained in this section is the restrictions that apply to the extent provided by statues, orders, directives, orders, etc. This goes for any permit or license before this was initiated.

            Whereas, the authority delegated by the President, agree with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of the State. It would be deemed that sanctions, restrictions are enforced to impose on that person. The following actions are the steps taken by heads of agencies, the Secretary of both State and Treasury. Denied approval of the Export/Import Bank regarding insurance, guarantee, extension of credit in relation to the exportation of any good to the restricted person. Any license will not be issued, or granted or any other detailed permission, or authority mind you, must be approved by the Government of the United States. Prohibiting the export, or re-export of technology or goods.

            The United States would oppose any loan from said financial institution that would help the sanctioned individual. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve as well as the Federal Reserve Bank of New York must not permit, allow, designate the restricted person regarding being a primary dealer debt instruments in the United States Government. Most important the sanctioned person will not be serving as an agent or repository for United States Government funds. Agencies, nor department shall not attain or enter a contract for services, goods for the sanctioned person in question. Visas would be denied by the Secretary of State. The Secretary of Homeland Security must exclude from the United States any alien that would be determined as a corporate principal or officer, shareholder with control of the interest sanctioned by treating that person with extreme prejudice, in the proclamation 8693, July 24, 2011, i.e., “(Suspension of entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans/International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions)”. There would be impositions imparted on the heads of agencies of the relevant departments on the officer/executive officer enacting similar functions with similar authorities after being selected by the Secretary of the Treasury and State. Anything prior to this is non-applicable.

            The following actions would be set in place by the Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of State, and the President himself. Property and interests in property that are in the United States would be blocked that would be in control of any United States person if they have been dealing with property that had been transferred, exported, or paid. There would be no transfer of credit payments between banks and other financial institutions. They would have to meet the approval of the United States. There would be no transacting, funding, or dealing with the sanctioned person. The Principal Executive Officer would have to pass the background search. The approval would have to come from the Secretary of the Treasury, as well as State and the President. The denial of approval from the Export/Import Bank of any insurance, extension of credit, or participation in the extension of credit, associated with the export of services/goods to the restricted person.

            Heads of agencies or departments can’t sign a contract for attaining services or goods from the restricted person. The Granting, leasing, or sale indirectly/directly of any defense article or defensive service shall not be licensed as per the Arms Control Act, section 38. The suspension of licenses will be delegated by agencies and departments being controlled by the Export Control Reform Act of 2018. Visas will be denied by the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Secretary of State. What is prohibited is something that avoids/evades by causing a violation or attempts defile any part of this are not allowed. The making of donations of stated prior are blocked. The purpose for these rules is to when the term person is mentioned it means entity or individual. What is defined by the term entity implies an association, joint venture, corporation, subgroup/group, or partnership.

            When the “United States person” is stated that refers to a permanent resident alien, any United states citizen, under the jurisdiction and laws of the United States, including foreign branches. Financial institution applies to a branch/agency of foreign banks, security firm, broker, insurance company, underwriter, or anyone else providing financial services. When United States financial institution is mentioned, it is in reference to under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction thereof. When referring to “sanctioned person” implies that the Secretary of the Treasury/State and the President have imposed the mandates.  If there are interests in property, they will be blocked that might have a presence in the U.S. The fact remains that the ability to transfer funds/assets instantly measures would be taken towards property to make them ineffective.

            These matters address national emergencies and need no notices of action to be taken in matters of property. The clamping down on unrestricted immigrant/nonimmigrants into the US sanctions had been set in place. It would be not in the best interest of the United States, and the entry would be suspended.  If need be appropriate actions would come into play. Clearly it states that nothing will interfere with the authority granted by law to be administered by the head of an agency or executive department. The actions of the Director of the Office of Mgt. shall not be affected either when it comes to Budget related matters. In short what is conveyed here is it isn’t meant to, nor create the benefit/right, enforceable at law against agencies, officers, entities, against the party of the US.