Top 5 Ways To Develop An Antagonist In Your Novel
Our antagonist is the worst of ourselves and our experiences. What we seek to change and what we know we can't. Here are the 5 steps to develop an antagonist in our novel.
Step 1: Appearance
Would unassuming be the best trait for a monster to have? To be able to commit acts of chaos in broad daylight without suspicion. For the sake of pragmatic thought let's label this as one. In committing any crime the greatest priority is to avoid detection, as evidenced by the number of arrests there are, this is no easy task.
Given your novel is your take on the world there are multiple ways to handle this, but the simplest would be to have a very antagonist that blends in well. Having no distinguishing features to set them apart in a crowd; With such a disconnect between the actions and appearance, one would incriminate themselves first.
Step 2: Motive
"For the greatest form of good" its been reworked many a time, but the motive stands. The antagonist should have the foresight to predict future events and use that to justify their extremism, assuming the worst course of action is the most likely one.
Everything the antagonist does should be in their eyes preventative measures to their foreseen cataclysmic event. The best antagonist is one that has a point that can't truly be disproved and shakes the protagonist's stance on what they hold true.
Step 3: Connection to the protagonist
The deep connection of the protagonist and antagonist can be relayed in a shared history or in shared ideals. There has to be a level of understanding that would show a connection of minds.
Assuming they aren't going to be in direct contact all the time, the protagonist has to be able to understand the motive of the antagonist simply from observing their actions. Why would they do what they did? Understanding how someone's mind works is the basis of nearly all books. Make it something unique and engaging.
Step 4: Personality
"Love to hate them" give your audience a character to despise, nothing less than the worst of the worst. Creativity is key, draw from the wellspring of negativity that drives your worst impulses.
Your character can act on all these uninhibited, it really falls on you how bad the character can be. What thoughts go ignored in your mind because you couldn't bring yourself to face them? Show the audience through your antagonist and the lengths they will go to accomplish their goals.
Step 5: Final Confrontation
Where the bubbling tension spills over after excessive heat. The final confrontation is dramatic and intense, something the audience has wanted from the beginning. Pack your story full of narrative explosives to make sure the detonation is flawless. The more that rides on the battle the better, innocent lives being paramount.
However, give an air of vengeance, make it clear how this is deserved, how much suffering had to be turned into a strength. This is the release for the reader, one way or another everything has to come to an end.
Opinions and Perspectives
I find the emphasis on an unassuming appearance fascinating. Some of the most chilling antagonists are those who could be your next-door neighbor.
The article makes a great point about motives. I've always believed that the best villains are the ones who think they're the heroes of their own story.
Really disagree with making antagonists 'the worst of the worst.' I think subtle villains are more effective than over-the-top evil ones.
Anyone else think the shared history aspect between protagonist and antagonist is overused? Sometimes random evil can be more terrifying.
Interesting how they suggest drawing from our own negative impulses. I've never thought about channeling my dark thoughts into character development.
The point about preventative measures is brilliant. It reminds me of Thanos. His methods were horrific but his concerns about overpopulation weren't entirely unfounded.
I actually tried this approach with my current novel. Making the antagonist blend in completely changed how I wrote the story.
While I understand the unassuming appearance angle, sometimes a physically intimidating villain can be incredibly effective if done right.
That part about understanding how someone's mind works really resonates with me. It's crucial for creating believable character dynamics.
You've got a point about physical appearance, but I think what matters more is their psychological impact on the protagonist.
The final confrontation advice feels a bit generic to me. Not every story needs a big explosive ending.
I love how the article emphasizes the importance of justification from the antagonist's perspective. Makes them so much more complex.
When I write, I find it challenging to make my antagonists truly believable. These steps actually help break it down nicely.
The shared ideals concept is intriguing. It's like holding up a dark mirror to your protagonist.
Anyone try writing an antagonist who's actually right about everything except their methods? That's real moral complexity.
I've found that giving my antagonist a sense of humor makes them much more memorable than just pure evil.
The article could have gone deeper into how to make the antagonist's actions consistently align with their motives.
Completely agree about drawing from personal experiences. My best villain came from exploring my own fears and prejudices.
Not sure I agree with making everything preventative. Sometimes pure malice or greed can be just as compelling.
The concept of narrative explosives is great. Building tension throughout the story makes the final confrontation so much more satisfying.